Resolutely against the grain, the author of this essay claims that the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a fraud consisting in presenting an essentially political initiative as scientific, and that this fraud is the greatest in modern science due to its blinding and planetary success. The essay also reads as an audacious lesson in rigor imparted by philosophy to science. The author suggests that the debate within the IPCC, which deals with the exact sciences, be distinguished from the debate on the IPCC, which is of an epistemological nature, that is to say institutional, logical, methodological.
